Hello There, Guest!  

Review Process

#1
The review process is going rather slow. Part of the reason for this, I think, is that reviewers are not assigned to a paper; as such, there is a deferral of responsibility. Maybe instead of having a free for all review process, we should have reviews sign up to review specific papers with an expectation that a particular reviewer is reviewing at least one paper at a given time. Maybe this wouldn't work. Another thing is that more reviewers are needed. Ideally, to expedite the review process we would have group funded editors, whose job was to catch typos etc. -- this way, research reviewers wouldn't have to waste as much time with language issues.
 Reply
 
Messages In This Thread
Review Process - by Chuck - 2014-Dec-07, 18:48:19
RE: Review Process - by Meng Hu - 2014-Dec-08, 01:51:52
RE: Review Process - by Chuck - 2014-Dec-08, 03:07:15
RE: Review Process - by Emil - 2014-Dec-08, 02:21:46
RE: Review Process - by Chuck - 2014-Dec-08, 03:12:22
RE: Review Process - by Duxide - 2014-Dec-08, 13:19:05
RE: Review Process - by Guglielmo Da Venezia - 2014-Dec-08, 04:35:14
RE: Review Process - by Emil - 2014-Dec-08, 03:52:32
RE: Review Process - by Emil - 2014-Dec-08, 12:46:34
RE: Review Process - by Duxide - 2014-Dec-08, 13:26:51
RE: Review Process - by Meng Hu - 2014-Dec-08, 17:50:22
RE: Review Process - by Emil - 2014-Dec-08, 18:10:05
 
Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)